http://caffeinatedthoughts.disqus.com/enSat, 23 Aug 2008 23:38:14 -0000http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2008/08/election-priorities/#comment-81851586<p>I agree with you on that.<br>Blessings,<br>Lance<br><a href="http://www.lancessoulsearching.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.lancessoulsearching.com">www.lancessoulsearching.com</a></p><p>Lance Garguss last blog post..<a href="http://lancessoulsearching.blogspot.com/2007/07/on-anvil_6148.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://lancessoulsearching.blogspot.com/2007/07/on-anvil_6148.html">On The Anvil</a></p>Lance GargusSat, 23 Aug 2008 23:38:14 -0000http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2008/08/election-priorities/#comment-81851585<p>Sounds to me like Mike's heard the Romney for vp rumors. I don't agree that McCain is as pro life as he states (the stem cell debate is in play there) but I think he is making the point that it definitely wouln't bode well for McCain if he chooses a vp without a solid pro life record.</p>MeganSat, 23 Aug 2008 22:59:17 -0000http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2008/08/election-priorities/#comment-81851582<p>Can we get a giant "duh"?</p><p><i>A government that decides that an unborn baby isn’t worth anything may one day decide that about me. Or you.</i></p><p>This might have a bit more effect if it wasn't coming from the guy who is just fine with injecting gov't into the "because it's good for you" field.<br><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1956758" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1956758">http://www.npr.org/template...</a></p>FoxfierSat, 23 Aug 2008 18:19:27 -0000