-
Website
http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/ -
Original page
http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=1409 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
stevemct
19 comments · 1 points
-
politicaljules
11 comments · 3 points
-
compassioninpolitics
8 comments · 1 points
-
Shane Vander Hart
1947 comments · 1 points
-
Kevin M.
5 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Chris Moran
Then Kai Ryssdal, the interviewer and host of the show asked, "If we stand a chance to make a profit, then why don't we do this more often?"
The expert demurred, "Well, Kai, that would be Socialism." I laughed out loud. Epic fail on Ryssdal's part.
@Wayne - assuming AIG will actually pay it back.
Now, I tend to be a minimalist (without being a Libertarian) regarding this question. But, I do think that we can learn something from Joseph's actions of having Pharaoh's empire acquiring the means of production in preparation for seven years of famine. Times of national crisis (such as war for example) create situations in which greater control and regulation may be the best option.
In other words, policies of minimal or maximal market regulation are not rooted in a timeless principle (true for all times and in all places), but rather are grounded in prudential decisions. That is to say, it's an issue of wisdom and not law.
So this brings us back to the question, "How much regulation should there be?" And to be honest, I don't have the foggiest idea. Properly answering this question is going to require true sons of Issachar (i.e., men who knew the times).