-
Website
http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/ -
Original page
http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=3059 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
stevemct
19 comments · 1 points
-
politicaljules
11 comments · 3 points
-
compassioninpolitics
8 comments · 1 points
-
Shane Vander Hart
1947 comments · 1 points
-
Kevin M.
5 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
What do you think Noll was trying to say?
I think, and I can't say for certain as I haven't gotten very far, he's looking at a lack of evangelical sponsored research universities and not funding (in 1994) a single periodical "devoted to in-depth interaction with modern culture."
He also cites a general inattention to intellectual life evidenced by the abandonment of the universities, the arts, and other realms of "high culture."
I think we've made progress in that area just thinking about what my alma mater, Trinity International University, is doing in the area of bioethics and engaging culture. They also started the Bannockburn Institute. There are similar evangelical works. Are we there yet? No, when your average evangelical in the pew can't adequately articulate a biblical worldview.
Sorry it took me so long to respond. I was away from my computer after posting this.
Second, there has been an incredible "dumbing down" in the Christian church. There is also idolatry in people disconnecting their own minds from the Word of God and instead handing themselves over to their leaders. They follow the leader and do not think for themselves, read the Bible for themselves, study for themselves. Also, they have come to despise "doctrine" - which requires study and sequential comprehension of truth.
The "dumbing down" has occurred culturally. Strong individuality has been weakened as the populace become increasingly spineless sheep who follow leaders and know nothing for themselves - do not question - just eat whatever is presented.
They are like handicapped children who have never learned to feed themselves. This is the loss of individuality which is birthed from strong personal relationship with God - when birthed most healthily, imo.
But, God is good and we're about to experience a Great Awakening. He'll wise us up and strengthen us in personal relationship with Him. But by the grace of God, we'd fall and never arise.
WE NEED THE MIND OF CHRIST and we must be able to think SCRIPTURALLY line upon line and precept upon precent systematically. When Christians cannot do that soundly by clear comprehension of sound doctrine - they lack the structural framework ideology to know good from evil and to order the world aright - to influence their culture positively by sound principles of truth... and are not all that intelligent... I would have to agree. We need the mind of Christ... DEVELOPED... and functional.
Yet, the truth is that the more the mind of Christ truly is developed the more it is assailed and called stupid by the world. I'm calling to the true mind of Christ and saying that is lacking at this time. But I believe God will build it now in this hour in a Great Awakening by His grace. He will teach us sound doctrine and our minds will become intelligent again in sound order - rather than the chaos of deconstructionism and the weakness of blind followers of the blind.
Read Ephesians 4:11 - they are gifts to the church for the edification of the Body. I agree that the CEO model of pastor is not healthy, but God did create the gift/office of elders/pastors.
That doesn't negate the priesthood of believers, but each part of the body does their job. Cutting off the pastors, is cutting off part of the body and that isn't helpful or healthy.
It's a shame Christ's Church is divided like it is. I would like to see a re-unification of all the various Christian communities, and the return to a universal Christian Communion, but I don't think that will happen until Christians everywhere can learn to give up their prejudices and really embrace the message of Christ. I think all of us need to be careful not to make wrath against sinner out idol.
As St. Thomas More once said in a vitriolic exchange with Martin Luther:
[W}ho can endure such a scoundrel who shows himself possessed by a thousand vices and tormented by a legion of demons, and yet stupidly boasts thus: 'The holy fathers have all erred. The whole church has often erred. My teaching cannot err, because I am most certain that my teaching is not my own but Christ's,' alluding of course to those words of Christ, 'My words are not my own but His who sent me, the Father's' (John 12:49)?
I don't think this is what Noll is getting at. Just so you know his theological bent, he's a reformed evangelical.
He's talking about taking the message of Christ and biblical worldview and engaging culture, not joining in on greater ecumenicism. Where it can happen I agree that it is a good thing, but there has been division in the past for good reason.
For instance with Martin Luther, I think the Solas are pretty important. I also would say that his argument against indulgences was valid as well, and while Luther certainly did have his vices (don't we all) it doesn't mean his arguments weren't sound, IMO.
Slowly and surely the followership mindset of discipleship is being questioned, reexamined, and people are thinking for themselves. It is taking time, but I believe it is none less then an awakening in the church to what God requires of us... to care for the poor and needy, the widow and the orphan.
I also believe that people are starting to remember that 200 million dollar budgets for buildings the size of stadiums does not bring God glory... it shames his name. What brings him glory is relationship with him, action as a result of that relationship and the willingess to give HIM the glory, not us.
We are purging our idols one by one, and as we do so we are becoming what Christ wants us to be... his bride, unblemished and clean.
That, from what I can tell so far, is the thrust of his book.
Now like I mentioned to Bob above I believe we've made progress in that area since 1994, and I agree with you that we are going in our compassion as well.